Java JSON Libraries
Which is faster for large JSON datasets: Jackson or Moshi?
Jackson is generally faster than Moshi for large JSON datasets, particularly in backend applications. Jackson uses streaming APIs and optimized parsers that excel with large payloads, often 10-20% faster in benchmarks. Moshi prioritizes safety and simplicity over raw speed, making it slightly slower but more predictable. Jackson's performance advantage increases with file size—for multi-megabyte JSON, the difference becomes significant. However, Moshi's performance is adequate for most mobile applications where files are smaller. Jackson offers more configuration options for performance tuning including afterburner module for bytecode generation. For Android, consider that Moshi has smaller binary size despite lower throughput. Profile your specific use case before choosing. Use our JSON Formatter at jsonconsole.com/json-formatter to prepare test data for benchmarking. Jackson wins for backend services processing large API responses, while Moshi suffices for typical mobile app needs. Choose based on actual performance requirements, not just benchmarks.
Last updated: December 23, 2025
Previous
Is Google's Gson library still recommended for new projects in 2025?
Next
Why is Moshi considered "safer" than Gson for Kotlin developers?
Related Questions
Is Google's Gson library still recommended for new projects in 2025?
Learn if Gson is still recommended in 2025. Compare Gson with Moshi and Jackson for new Java and Android projects.
Why is Moshi considered "safer" than Gson for Kotlin developers?
Learn why Moshi is safer than Gson for Kotlin. Understand null safety advantages and compile-time validation benefits.
Can Jackson be used in Android development as an alternative to Moshi?
Learn if Jackson can replace Moshi for Android development. Compare library sizes, performance, and mobile optimization.
Still have questions?
Can't find the answer you're looking for? Please reach out to our support team.